Publication Ethics
Publication Ethics Statement
Journal of Green Chemical and Environmental Engineering (JGCEE) is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal published by Candela Edutech Indonesia. The journal is committed to maintaining high standards of publication ethics, research integrity, transparency, accountability, and professional conduct throughout the publication process.
This policy applies to authors, reviewers, editors, editorial board members, the publisher, and other participants involved in scholarly publishing. JGCEE follows internationally recognized publication-ethics principles, including the COPE Core Practices, and promotes responsible research and trustworthy scholarly communication.
Academic Integrity Principles
Academic integrity is the foundation of responsible scholarly communication. All participants in the publication process are expected to uphold the following principles in research, review, editorial decision-making, and publication.
Research Integrity & Publication Misconduct
JGCEE is committed to safeguarding the integrity of the scholarly record. Publication misconduct includes, but is not limited to:
- Fabrication of research data or information.
- Falsification or manipulation of research data, methods, or findings.
- Plagiarism and self-plagiarism.
- Improper authorship practices.
- Undisclosed conflicts of interest.
- Multiple, redundant, or simultaneous submissions.
- Misleading manipulation of scientific images or figures.
- Citation manipulation.
- Peer-review manipulation.
- Misrepresentation of ethical approvals, research procedures, or results.
Similarity screening: JGCEE applies plagiarism screening and a maximum acceptable similarity threshold of ≤20%, excluding references and properly cited content.
Complaints & Appeals
JGCEE provides a mechanism for handling complaints and appeals concerning editorial decisions, peer review, publication delays, conflicts of interest, citation practices, publication misconduct, or the conduct of editors and reviewers.
- Complaints should provide sufficient information and supporting evidence where available.
- Complaints and appeals are handled fairly and confidentially.
- Editorial decisions are reviewed independently where appropriate.
- Responses and corrective actions are documented as part of the journal's editorial record.
Ethical Oversight
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research complies with applicable ethical, legal, and professional requirements. Where applicable, authors must provide evidence of:
- Ethical approval for research involving human participants.
- Informed consent where required.
- Compliance with animal welfare requirements.
- Permission to use copyrighted or third-party materials.
- Appropriate protection and management of confidential or sensitive information.
JGCEE may request supporting documentation during editorial evaluation or investigation.
Data Availability & Reproducibility
JGCEE promotes transparency and reproducibility. Authors are expected to retain the data, materials, and supporting evidence underlying their published findings and make them available upon reasonable request, subject to ethical, legal, confidentiality, privacy, or proprietary restrictions.
Conflicts of Interest & Funding Transparency
Authors, editors, and reviewers must disclose relationships or interests that could reasonably influence their judgment. Potential competing interests may include:
Authors should disclose funding sources and the role of funders in the research. Where applicable, authors may state: “The authors declare no competing interests.”
Citation Integrity
Citations must be relevant, accurate, verifiable, and academically justified. JGCEE does not tolerate practices intended to artificially influence citation counts, journal metrics, author metrics, or institutional metrics.
- Excessive or unjustified self-citation.
- Coercive citation.
- Citation stacking.
- Citation cartels.
- Manipulation of references or citation metrics.
Editor Responsibilities
Editors are responsible for maintaining the quality, integrity, fairness, confidentiality, and efficiency of the editorial process.
- Evaluate manuscripts based on scholarly merit, originality, relevance, and methodological quality.
- Ensure fair, objective, confidential, and timely peer review.
- Manage conflicts of interest appropriately.
- Maintain confidentiality of unpublished information.
- Investigate ethical concerns fairly and confidentially.
- Issue corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions when justified.
- Avoid discrimination based on personal or institutional characteristics.
- Never use unpublished information for personal or commercial advantage.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers contribute to the quality and credibility of published research. JGCEE uses a double-blind peer-review process for manuscripts that proceed to review.
- Accept assignments only within their area of expertise.
- Provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based evaluations.
- Maintain strict confidentiality.
- Identify relevant literature that has been overlooked where appropriate.
- Report suspected plagiarism, fabrication, falsification, or ethical concerns.
- Declare conflicts of interest before accepting or completing a review.
- Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe.
- Do not use unpublished manuscript information for personal advantage.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) & Generative Tools
JGCEE recognizes the use of AI and generative AI technologies as assistive tools in scholarly communication. Such use must not compromise scientific integrity, originality, transparency, confidentiality, or human accountability.
- AI may assist with language editing, grammar, translation, organization, or limited technical assistance.
- Authors must critically review and verify AI-assisted outputs.
- AI systems cannot be listed as authors or co-authors.
- AI must not fabricate, falsify, or misleadingly alter research data or results.
- AI-generated images must not misleadingly represent experimental findings.
- Substantive AI use must be disclosed transparently in the manuscript.
- Authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and scientific content of the manuscript.
“The authors used [name of AI tool/platform] to assist with [purpose of use]. All AI-generated outputs were reviewed and verified by the authors. The authors remain fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, integrity, and scientific content of the manuscript.”
Editorial & Ethical Workflow
Ethical concerns may be investigated at any stage of the editorial and post-publication process.
Corrections, Retractions & Post-Publication Discussions
JGCEE maintains mechanisms for correcting, updating, or retracting published content when necessary to protect the accuracy and integrity of the scholarly record.
Post-publication notices are linked to the affected article and, where applicable, associated with its DOI to preserve transparency of the scholarly record.
Publication History Transparency
JGCEE records important manuscript milestones to promote transparency in the editorial and publication process.
Publisher Responsibilities
Candela Edutech Indonesia supports editorial independence, ethical publishing, transparent journal management, protection of intellectual property, preservation of the scholarly record, and long-term accessibility of published content.
References & Ethical Framework
This publication ethics policy is informed by recognized publication-ethics principles and relevant JGCEE policies, including:
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Core Practices.
- COPE guidance on authorship, peer review, misconduct, complaints and appeals, conflicts of interest, data and reproducibility, ethical oversight, and post-publication corrections.
- JGCEE Plagiarism Policy.
- JGCEE Data Sharing Policy.
- JGCEE AI and Generative AI Policy.
- JGCEE Retraction and Correction Policy.
JGCEE is committed to responsible research, ethical publishing, transparency, accountability, and continuous improvement in scholarly communication. All participants are expected to contribute to the integrity and reliability of the scientific record.