Freedom of Expression and Its Implications for Citizens' Constitutional Rights Following Constitutional Court Decision No. 36/PUU-XX/2022
Main Article Content
Abstract
The judicial review of Law No. 11 of 2008, as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016, to the Constitutional Court was filed by twenty-nine content creators as petitioners, who felt that their constitutional rights had been violated by the enactment of Article 27 paragraph 3 and Article 28 paragraph (2) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, as they often give rise to multiple interpretations and are not in accordance with democratic principles in the concept of the rule of law. The purpose of this study is to determine how freedom of expression is regulated in the Indonesian legal system and its implications following Constitutional Court Decision Number 36/PUU-XX/2022. The method used in this study is normative legal research with a case approach. After analyzing the data sources obtained, this study concludes that in the context of the rule of law, freedom of expression is a fundamental right possessed by every individual and recognized universally. In a constitutional state, this freedom is guaranteed by the Constitution, as stated in Article 28E paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Freedom of expression serves to monitor and criticize those in power, maintain accountability, and encourage innovation and social progress. In addition, the Constitutional Court's decision has caused harm and/or negative impacts on democracy in Indonesia, including a decline in the democracy index, legal uncertainty, and losses in implementation.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Amanda Permatasari, Iman, and Junior Hendri Wijaya. “Implementasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Ujaran Kebencian Pada Media Sosial Implementation of Electronics Information and Transaction in Completion of the Problem of Hate Speech on Social Media.” Jurnal Penelitian Pers Dan Komunikasi Pembangunan 23, no. 1 (2019): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.46426/jp2kp.v23i1.101
Anam M. Syaful, “Indeks Demokrasi Indonesia.” ResearchGate, 2023. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Indonesia-Democracy-Index-2012-2022-Source-Economist-Intelligence-Unit-EIU-Based-on_fig1_376477415
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi: Serpihan Pemikiran Hukum, Media Dan HAM, 2005.
Bactiar. “Esensi Paham Konsep Konstitualisme Dalam Konteks Penyelenggaraan Sistem Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Dua : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 1 (2016): 122–38. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/9nwsm
Chica Septia Ningsih, Crise Amelia, Putri Aisyah, Rifka, Widya Ika Zahera, and Prasetya. “Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Yang Semakin Menyempit dan Memburuk.” Syntax Fusion : Jurnal Nasional Indonesia 75, no. 17 (2021): 399–405. https://doi.org/10.54543/fusion.v1i2.18
Diah Imaningrum Susanti. “Kebebasan Berekspresi dan Ujaran Kebencian: Kajian Filsafat Hukum Terapan.” Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus 7, no. 2 (2022): 17–42. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v7i2.363
Febriandy, Radians Krisna, and Umaimah Wahid. “Kemunduran Demokrasi di Indonesia: Analisis Laporan Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Institute 2024.” Kaganga:Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah Dan Riset Sosial Humaniora 7, no. 2 (2024): 1041–50. https://doi.org/10.31539/KAGANGA.V7I2.12392.
Gettari, Tri Rahmi, Wira Okta Viana, and Meydianto Mene. “Hak Asasi Manusia dan Kebebasan Berekspresi Di Indonesia .” Ensiklopedia of Journal 5, no. 2 (2023): 232–36. https://doi.org/10.33559/eoj.v5i2.1590
Guntara, Bima, and Ayni Suwarni Herry. “Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Media Sosial Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia".” Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling 3, no. 1 (2022): 4. https://doi.org/10.56087/qawaninjih.v3i1.406
Lusky Selian, Della, Cairin Melina, Riwayat Artikel, and Della Luysky Selian. “Freedom of Expression in the Era of Democracy: Records of Human Rights Enforcement Kebebasan Berekspresi di Era Demokrasi: Catatan Penegakan Hak Asasi Manusia” 2, no. 2 (2018): 185–94. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v2i2.27589
Mainake, Yosephus, and Luthvi Febryka Nola. “Dampak Pasal-Pasal Multitafsir Dalam Undang-Undang Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Info Singkat XII, no. 16 (2020): 1–6. https://jumas.ourhope.biz.id/ojs/index.php/JM/article/view/129
M. Taufik Rachman. “Juridical Implications of the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024 on Law Enforcement Regarding Electronic Information and Transactions.” Unizar Law Review 8, no. 1 (2025): 68–76. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.36679/ulr.v8i1.95.
Musqith, Munadhil Abdul; Tayibnapis, Radita Gora. “Ancaman Pidana Terhadap Kebebasan Berpendapat Sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik.” Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I 9, no. 4 (2022): 1307–18. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v10i6.38412.
Nasution, Latipah. “Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Dan Berekspresi Dalam Ruang Publik di Era Digital.” ’Adalah 4, no. 3 (2020): 37–48. https://doi.org/10.15408/adalah.v4i3.16200.
Pasca, Rezkyta, Abrini Daeng, Sigid Suseno, and Budi Arta Atmaja. “Application of Article 27 Paragraph (3) of the ITE Law in Cases of Defamation through Social Media against Groups of People.” Jurnal Fundamental 3, no. 1 (2022): 19–35. https://doi.org/10.30812/fundamental.v2i2.1796.
Pratama Taher Andrian, “Kasus Siswi SMP Jambi & Mengapa Masih ada Kriminalisasi Krittik?” tirto.id, 2023.https://tirto.id/kasus-siswi-smp-jambi-mengapa-masih-ada-kriminalisasi-kritik-gLzR
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 36/PUU-XX/2022 terhadap Undang-Undang) Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 perubahan Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik
Rahadi Budi Prayitno, and Arlis Prayugo. Teori Demokrasi Memahami Teori Dan Praktik. Sleman Yogyakarta: Grup Penerbitan CV Budi Utama, 2023.
Ramadlan, M. Fajar Shodiq. “Kemunduran Demokrasi dan Kebebasan Pers di Asia Tenggara: Refleksi dari Enam Negara Democratic Decline and Freedom of the Press in Southeast Asia: A Reflection From Six Countries.” Jurnal Penelitian Politik 18, no. 2 (2021): 141–57. https://ejournal.politik.lipi.go.id/.
Rahmazani. “Problematika Hukum Penerapan Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) Di Indonesia.” Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gajdah Mada 34, no. 1 (2022): 161–85. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i1.3078.
Roqib, Muhammad, Happy Anugraha Sutrisno Putra, Anwar Noris, and Hotma Parlindungan Ambarita. “Hak Atas Kebebasan Berekspresi Dan Berpendapat di Indonesia dengan di Amerika Serikat.” Perspektif Hukum 20, no. 1 (2020): 43. https://doi.org/10.30649/phj.v20i1.238.
Sa’adah, Nabitatus. “Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi dan Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 2 (2019): 235–47. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.235-247.
Sabela, Amira Rahma, Dina Wahyu Pritaningtias, and Universitas Negeri Semarang. “Study of Freedom of Speech and Expression in Legal Protection for Demonstrants in Indonesia.” Lex Scientia Law Review 1, no. 1 (2017): 81–92. https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v1i01.19484.
Saleh, Imam Anshori. Konsep Pengawasan Kehakiman. Malang: setara press, 2014.
Sayuti Una. Freedom of Opinion Menurut Negara Hukum Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gading Publishing, 2021.
Susanto, Muhamad Iqbal. “Kedudukan Hukum People Power Dan Relevansinya Dengan Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat Di Indonesia.” Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi 2, no. 2 (2019): 225–37. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v2i2.2844.
Syafa’at Anugrah Pradana, Rusdianto Sudirman, Muh. Andri Alvian. “Kemelitan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Hak Kebebasan Berpendapat.” Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 20 (2022): 156–68. https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v20i1.2811
Tan, Kendry. “Analisa Pasal Karet Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik Terhadap Asas Kejelasan Rumusan.” Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan 17, no. 1 (2022): 14–29. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v17i1.3376.
Thalhah, HM. “Teori Demokrasi Dalam Wacana Ketatanegaraan Perspektif Pemikiran Hans Kelsen.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 16, no. 3 (2009): 413–22. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol16.iss3.art6.
Triesti, Punik, Wijayanti, and Dona Budi Kharisma. “Ite Ditinjau Dari Legal Drafting Theori Oleh Teori Formil Rick Dikerson.” Souvereignty : Jurnal Demokrasi Dan Ketahanan Nasional 1, no. 4 (2022): 578–84. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376407922_Penerapan_Uu_Ite_Terhadap_Penyebaran_Berita_Hoax_Di_Era_Digital_Dalam_Perspektif_Hukum_Telematika
Wulandari, Siti, Almasyhuri Sulfary, rizky Rahajeng Tania Putri, Atikah Firdaus, and Sofyan Wimbo Agung Pradnyawan. “Dampak Pasal-Pasal Multi Tafsir Dalam UU ITE Terhadap Penanggulangan Cyber Di Indonesia.” Proceeding of Conference on Law and Social Studies 4, no. 3 (2021): 37–48. http://prosiding.unipma.ac.id/index.php/ColaS.
Yandy, Eza Tri, A Yuli Tauvani, Sulaeman Sulaeman, M. Yusuf, and Muhammad Isa. “The Principle of Checks and Balances in Islamic State Administration Studies.” Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah 7, no. 1 (2024): 165–83. https://doi.org/10.58824/mediasas.v7i1.118.