Assumptions of Objective Reality in Logical Positivism
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Logical positivism, as a 20th-century philosophical movement, posits that legitimate scientific knowledge can only be acquired through empirical verification and logical reasoning, while claims that cannot be tested or verified are considered meaningless. A central assumption in logical positivism is the concept of objective reality, which asserts that the external world exists independently of human subjectivity and can be understood through observation and scientific laws that are verifiable. This article explores the foundational assumptions regarding objective reality within logical positivism, focusing on the contributions of key figures such as Rudolf Carnap, Moritz Schlick, and A.J. Ayer. These philosophers argued that the physical world operates according to universal laws that can be verified through structured scientific methods. However, logical positivism has faced criticism, particularly concerning the principle of verificationism and its inability to accommodate the complexities of scientific theories that are not always directly verifiable. Critics such as Karl Popper and Willard Van Orman Quine have raised important questions about the relationship between theory, observation, and objective reality in science. Overall, while logical positivism has laid a significant foundation for modern scientific thought, it also faces profound challenges related to the limitations of verification theory and scientific objectivity.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Abney, Drew H., Rick Dale, Jeff Yoshimi, Chris T. Kello, Kristian Tylén, dan Riccardo Fusaroli. “Joint perceptual decision-making: a case study in explanatory pluralism.” Frontiers in Psychology 5 (April 2014). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00330.
Adhyaksa, Andika, dan Fathurrahim Fathurrahim. “Kondisi Materiil Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Dalam Aspek Pembentukannya Dengan Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence.” Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v5i3.2943.
A.J.Ayer. Language, Truth and Logic. The Classic Text Which Founded Logical Positivsm and modern British Philosophy, 1935. https://ia801606.us.archive.org/22/items/AlfredAyer/LanguageTruthAndLogic.pdf.
Andi Putra Sagita, Aziz Alfa. “Eksistensi Aliran Positivisme Hukum.” Prestisius Hukum Brilliance 6, no. 3 (2024). https://journalversa.com/s/index.php/phb/article/view/2904/3377.
Austin, John. Austin: The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. 1 ed. Disunting oleh Wilfrid E. Rumble. Cambridge University Press, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521546.
Bellamy, Richard, ed. The Rule of Law and the Separation of Powers. 1 ed. Routledge, 2017. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315085302.
Bentham, Jeremy. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Dover ed. Dover Publications, 2007.
Boumans, Marcel, John B. Davis, Mark Blaug, Harro Maas, dan Andrej Svorenčik. “Popper’s Logic of Discovery.” Dalam Economic Methodology, oleh Marcel Boumans, John B. Davis, Mark Blaug, Harro Maas, dan Andrej Svorenčik. Macmillan Education UK, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-54557-2_4.
Butler, Judith. Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge, 1999.
Feny Rita Fiantika, Mohammad Wasi, Sri Jumiyati. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. 1. PT. Global Eksekutif Teknologi, Sumatra Barat, 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anita-Maharani/publication/359652702_Metodologi_Penelitian_Kualitatif/links/6246f08b21077329f2e8330b/Metodologi-Penelitian-Kualitatif.pdf.
Florczak, Kristine L. “Capturing Truth for the Moment.” Nursing Science Quarterly 29, no. 4 (2016): 269–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318416661101.
Gavison, Ruth. “Taking Rights Seriously. By Ronald Dworkin [Harv. U.P., 1977, Enlarged Edition, 1978].” Israel Law Review 14, no. 3 (1979): 389–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700006427.
Hart, Herbert Lionel Adolphus. Law, Liberty and Morality. The Harry Camp Lectures. Oxford university press, 1991.
Hart, Hla, dan Leslie Green. The Concept of Law. Disunting oleh Joseph Raz dan Penelope A. Bulloch. Oxford University Press, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199644704.001.0001.
Horaguchi, Haruo H. “Organization Philosophy: A Study of Organizational Goodness in the Age of Human and Artificial Intelligence Collaboration.” AI & SOCIETY 40, no. 3 (2025): 1961–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01980-6.
Joko Sriwidodo. Hukum dalam perspektif sosiologi dan politik di Indonesia. 1. Kepel Press, 2020.
Kelsen, Hans, Bonnie Litschewski Paulson, dan Hans Kelsen. Introduction to the problems of legal theory: a translation of the first edition of the “Reine Rechtslehre” or pure theory of law. Repr. 2002. Clarendon Press, 2011.
Kesuma, Ulfa, dan Ahmad Wahyu Hidayat. “Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma.” Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 9 November 2020, 166. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043.
Nikiforov, Alexander L. dan Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences. “Ludwig Wittgenstein and Logical Positivism.” Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 58, no. 1 (2021): 22–30. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps20215813.
Nugraha, Harry Setya, Indah Satria, dan Yudiana Dewi Prihandini. “Logico-Empirisme Paradigma Positivisme Logis: Kritik Dan Tawaran Epistemologi Alternatif.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 32, no. 3 (2025): 556–80. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss3.art2.
Quine, W. V. Word and Object. Nachdr. MIT Press, 2002.
Radianto, Elia. “Interpetasi Modern Tentang Teori Dan Filosofis Penelitian.” Kritis 32, no. 1 (2023): 56–74. https://doi.org/10.24246/kritis.v32i1p56-74.
Shidarta, Susi Dwi Harijanti, Imran,Nathanael E. J. Sumampouw. Bunga Rampai; Memotret Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dari Berbagai Perspektif. 1. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia, 2024. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shidarta-Shidarta/publication/386462289_Penerapan_Aspek_Filosofis_Yuridis_dan_Sosiologis_dalam_Pertimbangan_Putusan_Hakim/links/6755db38ad10b614ef38fa2a/Penerapan-Aspek-Filosofis-Yuridis-dan-Sosiologis-dalam-Pertimbangan-Putusan-Hakim.pdf.
Shiner, Roger A. “W. J. Waluchow, Inclusive Legal Positivism, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994, Pp. x + 290.” Utilitas 10, no. 2 (1998): 249–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820800006142.
Smart, Carol. Feminism and the Power of Law. Sociology of Law and Crime. Routledge, 1989.
Solomon, Melesse. “The structure of scientific revolutions (Thomas S. Kuhn, 1970, 2nd ed. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press Ltd. 210 pages).” Philosophical Papers and Review 4, no. 4 (2013): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.5897/PPR2013.0102.
Stopes-Roe, Harry. “Wesley C. Salmon. Logic. Foundations of Philosophy Series. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N. J., 1963, Xiv + 114 Pp.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 29, no. 2 (1964): 89–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2270413.
Tushnet, Mark, M. Cain, A. Hunt, P. Hirst, dan C. Sumner. “Marx and Engels on Law.” British Journal of Law and Society 7, no. 1 (1980): 122. https://doi.org/10.2307/1409759.
Verhaegh, Sander. “Logical Positivism: The History of a ‘Caricature.’” Isis 115, no. 1 (2024): 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/728796.
Zaman, Asad. “Logical Positivism and Islamic Economics.” SSRN Electronic Journal, advance online publication, 2012. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2195043.